Validating user calculating server

I tried to update our WSUS Server to SP2, but during the process recieved the error "Windows Server Update Services 3.0 SP2 could not install WSUSService and the performance counters." Does anyone have any suggestions, here is the log file: 2009-04-07 Success MWUSSetup Validating pre-requisites... Version required: 2.0.50727 or higher 2009-04-07 Success MWUSSetup .

2009-04-07 Success MWUSSetup IIS is not installed. Net framework of required version is not installed on this machine 2009-04-07 Error MWUSSetup Failed to determine if an higher version of WSUS is installed. (Error 0x80070002: The system cannot find the file specified.) 2009-04-07 Error MWUSSetup Failed to Co Create CLSID_MSAdmin Base (Error 0x80040154: Class not registered) 2009-04-07 Error MWUSSetup Failed to initialize CIISWeb Service object (Error 0x80040154: Class not registered) 2009-04-07 Error MWUSSetup CIISWeb Service:: Create failed (Error 0x80040154: Class not registered) 2009-04-07 Error MWUSSetup Failed to create webservice object (Error 0x80040154: Class not registered) 2009-04-07 Error MWUSSetup Failed to determine if IIS is running under IIS 5 isolation mode. (Error 0x80040154: Class not registered) 2009-04-07 Error MWUSSetup CSetup Driver: Launch Setup: Pre-requisites check failed.

Write Line("Re = " + r Equvelent); break; case "P": r Equvelent = ((value Of The First One * factor Of The First One) * (value Of The Second One * second Factor)) / ((value Of The First One * factor Of The First One) + (value Of The Second One * second Factor)); Console. ) Huge switches on the factors can be replaced by simple formulas.

I just finished it and was wondering if you could review it for me. I'm open to learning what's bad, what's good (if it even has any in it) and how I can improve it. Write Line("First tell me are we using RESISTORS or CAPACITOR ? Write Line("Ce= " + c Equevelent); break; } break; } Console. Write Line("Ce= " + c Equevelent); break; case "P": c Equevelent = (value Of The First One * factor Of The First One) + (value Of The Second One * second Factor); Console. } switch ((int)second Factor) { case 1: second Factor = 0.001m; break; // ... It bloats the codebase and hurts readability and maintanability. In this particular case, you could create a method converting factors (expressed as 1, 2, 3 etc.) into actual values (0.001m, etc.) and call it twice in your code, cutting down on needless repetition.

To Upper()) { case "S": decimal c Equevelent = ((value Of The First One * factor Of The First One) * (value Of The Second One * second Factor)) / ((value Of The First One * factor Of The First One) + (value Of The Second One * second Factor)); Console. switch ((int)factor Of The First One) { case 1: factor Of The First One = 0.001m; break; case 2: factor Of The First One = 0.000001m; break; // ...

Write Line("Re= " + r Equvelent); break; } break; case "C": switch (connection. Clear(); break; case "NO": go Again = false; Console. Switches on the component types and serial/parallel connections can be greatly simplified if you recall what is the impedance (~R for the resistor and ~1/C for the capacitor) Minor issues with the code style like inconsistent variables naming (e.g.

english-premier-league.ru

81 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>